What image do we do in the military sense of governance?
The military normally is a defender of the country, the protector of citizens who intervenes in the political situations in case of confiscation of power or major disturbances.
Why are they hated once in power?
For most people, the military is one that oppresses, that unworthy, who chained freedom and had a civil wedding. In short, the military is a violent man. It has no place in a barracks or war. Put in power is the wrong target is to sacrifice a whole nation. For this, there is nothing civilians and themselves.
If this happens, what can we do analysis of a military regime like that of Thomas Sankara of Burkina Faso who had to fight the development of products grown and processed in place Hence the slogan: Produce and consume Burkina Faso Burkina Faso? Dadis government, which was evidence of progress in a few months without outside help in the fairness and transparency? The military coup of Nigerian Djibrilla Hamidou which was applauded? Versus civilian dictatorial regimes like Sekou Toure in Guinea-Conakry; that Marc Ravalomanana of Madagascar to name them.
Would it not a confusion of language to say that a military government is anti-democratic?
